Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrew Roberts's avatar

Bates was one of the first exponents of rational choice theory in comparative politics, while Scott is a qualitative thinker who is skeptical of the whole deriving generalizations approach to political science.

If you are looking for a book that may change the way you look at the world, you might try Scott's last book, Against the Grain. I just finished reading it and found novel insights on just about every page. And this is despite being more like Bates in my approach to PS.

Expand full comment
John Bullock's avatar

Thank you—I'll check out Against the Grain.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts